“Let's start with the bad news.” is how the conclusion to my guests’ book about changing grading practice begins. “No one is coming to save us. No consultant is going to sweep through and fix things for a fee. No new technology, digital, online, or otherwise, is going to change the game.” The game, of course, is school, and the currency of that game is grades.
Their 2023 book, Off the Mark: How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning (but Don’t Have To), is a thorough, and at times frustratingly pragmatic, exploration of flawed necessity of the load bearing pillars of “real school” – grades, transcripts, and standardized tests – their origins in our nation’s history, the distorting effects they tend to have on the outcomes and goals of education, why nothing has arisen so far to replace them at scale, and why there are no magic potions: “No one is going to wake up one morning and realize that the answer was staring us in the face all along,” they remind us.
Balancing the real with the ideal, they also chart a path toward the possibility for something different, and like the grand experiment of public schooling itself, it’s something we’ll have to figure out and build together.
Jack Schneider is Dwight W. Allen Distinguished Professor in the College of Education at the UMass - Amherst. He is the Executive Director of the Beyond Test Scores Project. Director of the Center for Education Policy. Co-Editor of the History of Education Quarterly, and Co-Host of the Have You Heard Podcast.
Ethan Hutt is the Gary Stuck Faculty Scholar in Education and associate professor at the UNC Chapel Hill School of Education.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,480
I think my great hope for this book is not that people will read it and say, great, look,
2
00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:11,360
we're going to go with double clickable transcripts, we're going to go with overwriteable grades,
3
00:00:11,360 --> 00:00:15,520
we're going to restore the use value of education.
4
00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:16,520
That's not our hope.
5
00:00:16,520 --> 00:00:17,920
At least it's not my hope.
6
00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:23,520
My hope is that we will just make visible the water in which we swim.
7
00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:27,320
That's my hope.
8
00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:31,480
Let's start with the bad news, is how the conclusion to my guest book about changing
9
00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:33,600
grading practice begins.
10
00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:37,840
No one is coming to save us, no consultant is going to sweep through and fix things for
11
00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:43,880
a fee, no new technology, digital, online or otherwise, is going to change the game.
12
00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:48,040
The game, of course, is school, and the currency of that game is grades.
13
00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:53,200
Jack Schneider is Dwight W. Allen Distinguished Professor in the College of Education at UMass
14
00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:54,200
Amherst.
15
00:00:54,640 --> 00:00:59,040
He's the Executive Director of the Beyond Test Scores Project, Director of the Center
16
00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:04,640
for Education Policy, co-editor of the History of Education Quarterly, and co-host of the
17
00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:06,880
Have You Heard podcast.
18
00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:11,960
Ethan Hutt is the Gary Stuck Faculty Scholar in Education and Associate Professor at the
19
00:01:11,960 --> 00:01:14,960
UNC Chapel Hill School of Education.
20
00:01:14,960 --> 00:01:20,680
Their 2023 book, Off the Mark, How Grades, Ratings and Rankings Undermine Learning, But
21
00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:26,040
Don't Have To, is a thorough and at times frustratingly pragmatic exploration of the
22
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:30,840
flawed necessity of the load-bearing pillars of real school.
23
00:01:30,840 --> 00:01:36,360
Grades, transcripts and standardized tests, their origins in our nation's history, the
24
00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:41,600
distorting effects they tend to have on the outcomes and goals of education, why nothing
25
00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:47,300
has arisen so far to replace them at scale, and why there are no magic potions.
26
00:01:47,300 --> 00:01:51,060
No one is going to wake up one morning and realize that the answer was staring us in
27
00:01:51,060 --> 00:01:54,140
the face all along, they remind us.
28
00:01:54,140 --> 00:01:58,460
Balancing the real with the ideal, they also chart a path toward the possibility for something
29
00:01:58,460 --> 00:01:59,460
different.
30
00:01:59,460 --> 00:02:04,180
And like the grand experiment of public schooling itself, it's something we'll have to figure
31
00:02:04,180 --> 00:02:06,300
out and build together.
32
00:02:06,300 --> 00:02:09,460
Jack and Ethan, thank you so much for taking the time to be with me today.
33
00:02:09,460 --> 00:02:11,780
Yeah, thanks for having us.
34
00:02:11,780 --> 00:02:13,780
That was an amazing introduction.
35
00:02:13,860 --> 00:02:18,260
I think we're going to have to transcribe that and use it ourselves, yeah.
36
00:02:18,260 --> 00:02:21,380
So I figured we would just start right away with that bad news part.
37
00:02:21,380 --> 00:02:22,740
Let's start at the end, right?
38
00:02:22,740 --> 00:02:24,880
Tear the bandage off right away.
39
00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:28,820
Because if I understand the book correctly, we won't be getting rid of grades, transcripts
40
00:02:28,820 --> 00:02:33,040
and standardized tests for public schools at scale anytime soon.
41
00:02:33,040 --> 00:02:34,660
So why the heck not?
42
00:02:34,660 --> 00:02:36,260
So let's start there.
43
00:02:36,260 --> 00:02:38,900
Yeah, it's a really good question.
44
00:02:38,900 --> 00:02:45,740
And one of the things that I continue to joke about when we're doing interviews about the
45
00:02:45,740 --> 00:02:50,260
book is the fact that we probably could have sold a lot more books if we had said something
46
00:02:50,260 --> 00:02:51,260
different.
47
00:02:51,260 --> 00:02:57,300
If we had said, you know, all you need to do is follow the Hutt-Schneider four-step
48
00:02:57,300 --> 00:03:02,500
plan for weaning yourself off of grades, tests and transcripts.
49
00:03:02,500 --> 00:03:10,980
The problem is that they are so baked into not only the infrastructure of schooling and
50
00:03:10,980 --> 00:03:19,780
education and credentialism, but also to the culture of schooling and American life.
51
00:03:19,780 --> 00:03:22,800
So let's start with the latter of those two, right?
52
00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:27,900
If you dropped your kid off at a school that didn't give grades, right?
53
00:03:27,900 --> 00:03:31,340
What are the odds that you would say, this is fantastic.
54
00:03:31,340 --> 00:03:36,900
I love that the school is going to focus on intrinsic motivation rather than extrinsic
55
00:03:36,900 --> 00:03:41,140
motivation or any of the other positive things you might say about that, right?
56
00:03:41,140 --> 00:03:46,660
I think most of us would say, well, how is my kid going to get into college then if there
57
00:03:46,660 --> 00:03:48,380
are no grades, right?
58
00:03:48,380 --> 00:03:55,960
If you dropped your child off at a school that had no transcripts, right?
59
00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,840
Let's imagine it's a college or university, right?
60
00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:04,960
If your child has already successfully passed that hurdle, you would likely wonder, well,
61
00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:10,360
how is my kid going to be motivated to work hard knowing that, you know, he or she or
62
00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:16,560
they is, they're now 18 years old, living on their own, and there is nothing holding
63
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:22,040
them accountable for making good on tuition payments there.
64
00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:26,200
So there's the cultural piece that we need to deal with, which is reinforced by the fact
65
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,120
that we've all been through school ourselves.
66
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:35,420
So this isn't just about the culture of the present and the ways that we use grades, tests,
67
00:04:35,420 --> 00:04:36,900
and transcripts in our lives.
68
00:04:36,900 --> 00:04:42,940
It's also about the fact that we have expectations about what a real school is and does.
69
00:04:42,940 --> 00:04:48,540
And then there's the infrastructural piece, which is that there are all kinds of decisions
70
00:04:48,540 --> 00:04:56,720
that are being made all the time on the basis of test results, grades, course titles, right?
71
00:04:56,720 --> 00:04:59,600
That's a feature of transcripts that we often ignore.
72
00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:06,080
We often think of transcripts merely as places where grades and test scores reside forever
73
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:11,480
permanently, but they're also places where course titles live.
74
00:05:11,480 --> 00:05:17,680
That offers an additional venue for students to game these metrics, and that's something
75
00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:20,860
that I'm sure we'll get into in this conversation.
76
00:05:20,860 --> 00:05:27,080
But that infrastructure would be very hard to totally upend when we're talking about
77
00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:36,240
13,000 school districts, 98,000 public schools, never mind 20,000 or so, 30,000 private schools
78
00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:41,640
that we could add into the mix, and thousands of colleges and universities.
79
00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:46,800
So it's a major, major undertaking to do anything.
80
00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:52,160
I think what we're trying to do in this book is convince people this is worth our time
81
00:05:52,160 --> 00:05:54,240
and energies.
82
00:05:54,240 --> 00:05:59,240
One of the things that we try to do as historians of education is try to understand where did
83
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:00,880
these practices come from?
84
00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:05,880
And what Jack is talking about, both the cultural piece and the idea that it really holds our
85
00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:12,120
system together, the idea that we use common metrics, the idea that we have a common way
86
00:06:12,240 --> 00:06:18,600
of presenting the work of school, and that works not just for parents of students, but
87
00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:25,120
also future audiences of those transcripts, so colleges, employers, that all of these
88
00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:29,440
things, and we often in the book talk about grades, tests, and transcripts as technologies
89
00:06:29,440 --> 00:06:35,320
because that's what they are, that these technologies were invented for a particular purpose, and
90
00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:38,040
those purposes endure in our system.
91
00:06:38,040 --> 00:06:43,080
So we need to communicate, we need to motivate, we need to synchronize our system, and so
92
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:48,920
as much as we would love to sell more books and just be like, well to hell with grades,
93
00:06:48,920 --> 00:06:54,120
you're removing a core function of the system, and you should expect that the system is going
94
00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:59,280
to respond, and so I'm sure talk about it, but it's not that people have had no ideas
95
00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:04,960
about alternative ways, but it's whether those ideas can actually fulfill the purposes for
96
00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:06,720
which we first invented these things.
97
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:10,640
And so part of the conversation in the book, and one that we're hoping to have with educators
98
00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:14,640
around the country is, okay, let's think about those purposes, let's think about what our
99
00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:20,240
technologies are doing, and maybe it's time to take advantage of new technologies to update
100
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:25,360
some of our practices, but you're never going to get away from those sort of core functions
101
00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:32,280
that grades, test scores, and transcripts perform, and if you pretend otherwise, you're
102
00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:34,200
just selling something.
103
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:40,080
Yeah, I think you all said it very well in the book over and over again that schools,
104
00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:44,240
you know, the American education system, as much as it might be anathema now to kind of
105
00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:49,040
say this, but they're inherently conservative institutions that resist, you know, these
106
00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:54,640
kinds of radical changes, and we'll get to, I think, the solutions that you all offer,
107
00:07:54,640 --> 00:08:01,840
but really reducing the potential for both top-down and the bottom-up reforms back to
108
00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:07,040
those first principles and really seeing how can we change it to help meet communication,
109
00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:10,600
meet the need for synchronization, and meet those other needs that grades, transcripts,
110
00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:15,400
test scores help communicate really does chart a very clear path forward.
111
00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:20,240
But I think before we get to that forward path, let's actually look back to perhaps the
112
00:08:20,240 --> 00:08:22,400
origins of the book.
113
00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:28,400
You know, you wrote in the introduction that the project started before COVID.
114
00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:33,960
I don't know if that was, you know, 2019 or just early 2020, but, you know, COVID for
115
00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:38,480
all of its horribleness did provide a kind of case study for how the education system
116
00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:42,880
responds to these drastic, dramatic changes.
117
00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,440
And perhaps we can talk about more of what we saw in that.
118
00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:50,600
But I just want to know, too, what led you both to start collaborating on this topic,
119
00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:57,320
on this project, the stuff that eventually became off the mark?
120
00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:02,520
Well, we're looking at you.
121
00:09:02,520 --> 00:09:07,720
The project started, I think, way back when we were in graduate school together.
122
00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:12,280
Ethan and I shared a dismal basement office with each other.
123
00:09:12,280 --> 00:09:19,440
And, you know, to bring people really behind the curtain, this office was so bad that if
124
00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:28,160
you sat at Ethan's desk and your office mate was not sitting at his desk, that the light
125
00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:35,840
sensor that needed to sense movement from you in order to provide illumination would
126
00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:37,880
not register that anybody was in the office.
127
00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:42,520
So I would often come back to our office and Ethan would be quietly working in the dark.
128
00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:52,680
But we have been friends and collaborators for, gosh, at this point, you know, 15 years,
129
00:09:52,680 --> 00:09:55,040
maybe closer to 20 years.
130
00:09:55,040 --> 00:10:01,360
And one of the things that we're both really interested in, and I'll defer to Ethan for
131
00:10:01,360 --> 00:10:07,400
a more detailed description here because he tends to be more precise in the way he talks
132
00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:08,960
about this stuff than I am.
133
00:10:08,960 --> 00:10:15,200
But one of the things that we're both really interested in is the way that behaviour and
134
00:10:15,200 --> 00:10:26,840
action is shaped by things like rules and measurement and systems that are often based
135
00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:29,160
on really thin information.
136
00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:30,240
Right?
137
00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:37,600
Just speaking only for myself here, we are such interesting, complex, thoughtful, capable
138
00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:46,640
life forms, and yet we pin ourselves in with these very thin rules that are not able to
139
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:55,280
capture the thickness of life or the richness of what we can work through in terms of human
140
00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:56,560
deliberation.
141
00:10:56,560 --> 00:11:03,000
And for me, that irony, and it's a kind of tragic irony, is really interesting and we
142
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:08,480
could look at it anywhere, but I think it's most interesting and sometimes most tragic
143
00:11:08,480 --> 00:11:17,080
in education because we do it at such large scale and we do it for what we think is, you
144
00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:23,640
know, the best interests of 50 million young people who are in the schools.
145
00:11:23,640 --> 00:11:27,120
Yeah, I mean, we've always, I think Jack and I have always shared an interest.
146
00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:34,680
We had a mutual mentor in David Tyak who always talked about the important part of the grammar
147
00:11:34,680 --> 00:11:35,680
of schooling.
148
00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:39,800
So those things in the school that we take for granted and they're just, you know, when
149
00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:42,920
Jack was talking earlier about, like, when you show up at a school, how do you know it's
150
00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:43,920
a school?
151
00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:47,040
You know, all those things, you know, that's part of the grammar of schooling.
152
00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:48,040
It's what we expect.
153
00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:51,320
It's how we communicate about education systems.
154
00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:55,120
And I think we've always shared an interest in kind of thinking about, OK, the pieces
155
00:11:55,160 --> 00:11:57,720
of that grammar and where they came from and what they do.
156
00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:04,680
And I've had in my work both with Jack and without is a particular interest in how we
157
00:12:04,680 --> 00:12:08,200
communicate about the work of schools to the public.
158
00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:11,360
So, you know, whether it's test scores and grades.
159
00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:16,080
And so one of the interesting things about these technologies, these assessment technologies
160
00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:20,760
is that they have multiple audiences and those audiences have expanded in scope over time.
161
00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:27,200
And so thinking about how these practices have evolved has always just been really
162
00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:32,400
fascinating to me and just, you know, we we wrote a piece, our very first, I think,
163
00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:34,720
collaboration together, I think it was in 2014.
164
00:12:34,720 --> 00:12:39,560
We we first wrote about the grading system and, you know, we just kept coming back to
165
00:12:39,560 --> 00:12:41,680
those kinds of of questions.
166
00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:45,840
And then obviously, you know, we've all experienced together No Child Left Behind,
167
00:12:45,840 --> 00:12:49,120
which added another layer of this sort of communication.
168
00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:54,920
So thinking about those practices and again, coming from them, as you said, like from a
169
00:12:54,920 --> 00:12:59,560
place of like there's preserved wisdom and in some of these inherited practices doesn't
170
00:12:59,560 --> 00:13:01,240
mean they're perfect and can't be improved.
171
00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:06,520
But I think especially when you look at the history of school reform, too often we have
172
00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:08,640
reformers who are like, I know better.
173
00:13:08,680 --> 00:13:10,320
The teachers don't. Everything is broken.
174
00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:13,800
Let's throw it out. And, you know, my sister is a second grade teacher.
175
00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:18,520
My mom was a teacher. When you talk to teachers, they have a lot of understanding and
176
00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:19,600
knowledge about the system.
177
00:13:19,600 --> 00:13:24,000
And so this idea that schools are conservative or that reform should approach things in a
178
00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:25,200
conservative way.
179
00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:30,640
What we're talking about a lot of times is preserving the both the shared experience of
180
00:13:30,640 --> 00:13:34,480
folks, but also the the knowledge when teachers look at a lot of reforms, they go, that's
181
00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:38,720
not going to work. You can make me try to do this or maybe I will just not do it, but it's
182
00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:43,720
not going to work. And so thinking and treating the system with care rather than just taking
183
00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:48,360
a wrecking ball to it, which may may speak to our kind of like our deeper, you know,
184
00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:50,000
let's let's burn it all down.
185
00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:54,440
But practically speaking, those reforms are not are not built to last.
186
00:13:56,880 --> 00:14:01,480
That's what I think I mentioned in the intro, right, was that frustrating pragmatism as
187
00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:06,080
someone who kind of considers them, you know, myself as a when I was in the classroom
188
00:14:06,080 --> 00:14:11,320
practicing grades, really leaning into ways that I can diminish the salience, the
189
00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:16,800
importance of grades and grading, really changing reporting practices in my own
190
00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:20,880
practice. And now, you know, working at that big systems level to try and say, how can
191
00:14:20,880 --> 00:14:25,520
we improve the system both for students, but also make it workable for teachers and
192
00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:30,680
community and parents alike, like trying to triangulate all of those needs can't be
193
00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:33,840
done simply by changing one part of that equation, right?
194
00:14:33,840 --> 00:14:39,160
You have to get all of those folks at the table and ask what is going to work to meet the
195
00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:44,640
needs of everybody. And really, you know, primarily the work that we that my organization
196
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:47,360
does is focus groups with kids, with community members.
197
00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:50,960
And when you actually sit those two groups down and look at what they say about the
198
00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:55,920
changes they want the system to be, kids and parents predominantly like agree on the
199
00:14:55,920 --> 00:14:58,680
ways in which that system could change.
200
00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:05,600
So there's a lot more, I think, collaboration there than, again, leaders who are kind of
201
00:15:05,600 --> 00:15:11,360
at the top of the system trying to move those top-down reforms without getting buy-in from
202
00:15:11,360 --> 00:15:15,320
teachers or teachers not getting buy-in from students or schools not getting buy-in from
203
00:15:15,320 --> 00:15:20,000
parents, right? We've kind of lost that community aspect to it.
204
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:25,560
I really want to know then in the process of researching and writing the book, which
205
00:15:25,560 --> 00:15:31,240
sounds like it's been going on for basically this is the culmination of a decade of work
206
00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:33,840
on this, a 15-year collaboration.
207
00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:39,160
What about that process of research and writing this book, either challenged, affirmed or
208
00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:43,920
changed your perspectives on grades, transcripts, testing, any one of those kinds of
209
00:15:43,920 --> 00:15:46,800
concepts that you guys look at?
210
00:15:46,800 --> 00:15:49,520
So it's interesting. I mean, there's so much that you learn.
211
00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:55,560
I think the very first thing that I learned was, you know, is sort of where you started,
212
00:15:55,560 --> 00:15:59,800
where, you know, you kind of are led to believe, you know, when you enter like, oh,
213
00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:05,360
American public education is bad and Finland has the answer and Germany has the answer
214
00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:08,000
and, you know, Korea has the answer and the Soviets have the answer.
215
00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:12,520
And like the very first thing you sort of realize as you look at other practices and
216
00:16:12,520 --> 00:16:17,200
especially if you take seriously the idea that, you know, it's that there's a cultural
217
00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:22,920
element to these practices that there's no secret sauce.
218
00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:27,640
And I mean, it's like you can you can take some exotic practice.
219
00:16:27,640 --> 00:16:30,960
It's like taking a plant out of, like, you know, the rainforest and then moving it to
220
00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,960
like the desert of L.A. It's like it's like there's so much that goes into these
221
00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:38,560
practice. It's not a it's not a technical problem in the sense of like, oh, you just
222
00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:41,680
you just grab something off the shelf or grab some secret practice.
223
00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:44,160
I spent time abroad and I figured this out.
224
00:16:44,440 --> 00:16:49,720
You know, once once you sort of give up the idea that there is some holy grail out
225
00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:51,200
there of practices.
226
00:16:51,560 --> 00:16:55,440
And as you say, focus on like the sort of human element, like what are the problems
227
00:16:55,440 --> 00:16:58,040
that these folks were trying to solve over time?
228
00:16:58,440 --> 00:17:00,880
You know, you just realize how embedded they are.
229
00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:03,760
Like one of the things that never really had occurred to me.
230
00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:10,360
You know, in a real concrete sense, until I got into it was like how there really is
231
00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:15,360
historically a real symbiotic relationship between this idea of local control, the idea
232
00:17:15,360 --> 00:17:19,920
that we want communities to be able to make decisions for themselves and have flexibility
233
00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:24,160
and talking about what practices make sense, what courses make sense, what trajectory
234
00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:28,960
for our students makes sense and this need because we live in a very large country
235
00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:30,960
that has a decentralized system.
236
00:17:30,960 --> 00:17:35,960
And I think most of us like on on a regular basis like that, that we have a school
237
00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:42,560
board and we have teachers that have flexibility, that that almost requires
238
00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:49,160
somewhere in the system, some standardization, some points of synchronization, as we
239
00:17:49,160 --> 00:17:55,080
call it in the book, that allows people to move from that decentralized local practice
240
00:17:55,080 --> 00:17:56,400
to some higher level.
241
00:17:56,560 --> 00:18:01,960
And you see this with transcripts and this idea that we need a common currency to record
242
00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:03,520
like, well, how much learning is learning?
243
00:18:03,520 --> 00:18:07,600
We need a unit and we give time, you know, pride of place there.
244
00:18:07,840 --> 00:18:10,280
But same with, you know, things like the SAT.
245
00:18:10,520 --> 00:18:16,240
I've done work on the GED, like having these these tests that kind of sit on top and
246
00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:20,400
allow for flex in the system, those practices come together.
247
00:18:20,400 --> 00:18:23,480
So we often talk about standardized tests and grades as separate.
248
00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:26,520
And one of the things that we really liked about the book, because we had done that in
249
00:18:26,520 --> 00:18:30,440
our own writing, having them separate, was putting them together and actually say like,
250
00:18:31,280 --> 00:18:35,040
you can mess with these, but often the other one is picking up the slack.
251
00:18:35,080 --> 00:18:40,080
So if you want to get rid of the SAT, you're putting more weight on grades.
252
00:18:40,120 --> 00:18:43,520
And if you want to get rid of grades, like some countries do that, no one looks at
253
00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:47,080
transcripts, you're going to put all the weight on, you know, a test.
254
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:52,000
So thinking about how these are actually sort of in conversation, they're linked in the
255
00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:56,760
system was one of the big revelations is that we have to think about these as a whole
256
00:18:56,760 --> 00:19:01,720
system set of practices and not just like tinker with one practice or the other.
257
00:19:03,200 --> 00:19:07,120
Yeah, Ethan got into this in his response there.
258
00:19:07,160 --> 00:19:15,320
But one of the things that I learned from him along the way was to be a cold hearted
259
00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:19,680
realist about this and not just be a dreamer.
260
00:19:20,280 --> 00:19:28,120
I am a former classroom teacher and and I think it is my inclination to try to take
261
00:19:28,120 --> 00:19:30,160
big swings at things.
262
00:19:30,160 --> 00:19:36,800
And I think had I tried to write this book or do any of this work without Ethan, I might
263
00:19:36,800 --> 00:19:46,080
have verged into, you know, not snake oil sales, but, you know, I think dreaminess,
264
00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:52,240
right? Like I'm good at identifying all of the problems that exist.
265
00:19:52,280 --> 00:20:01,280
I can just rattle off all of the ways that grades distort motivation and undermine the
266
00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:07,800
kind of communication that educators in their hearts want to do with young people.
267
00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:14,040
I can tell you all of the ways that standardized testing, whether it is run by the state or
268
00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:20,920
an external entity like the College Board, is designed in a manner that fails to incentivize
269
00:20:21,080 --> 00:20:26,960
real authentic learning, undermines the practices of educators that are responsive to the
270
00:20:26,960 --> 00:20:28,240
real needs of young people.
271
00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:36,240
Right. I can go on this all day, but what I don't naturally do is think about the usefulness
272
00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:43,440
of things like standardized tests or the ways in which grades actually do serve a real
273
00:20:43,440 --> 00:20:48,480
important purpose, including for equity, which is often a critique that I will level against
274
00:20:48,480 --> 00:20:53,600
grades. But, you know, one of the things that I learned from Ethan in doing this project
275
00:20:53,600 --> 00:21:03,600
was that a grade has just enough vagueness to it, right, that it can allow for important
276
00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:11,760
kinds of slippage. And what I mean by that is that we take for granted that a course
277
00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:17,960
title has a particular meaning and that a grade in that course has a particular meaning.
278
00:21:18,360 --> 00:21:27,440
And that allows for formal equity in our educational system in a way that I think it is
279
00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:34,880
hard to imagine existing if we said, well, let's allow people to just use their own
280
00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:41,840
judgment with no formal guidance, no restrictions, no rules here in interpreting what it
281
00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:49,800
means that a student in a high poverty community from a historically marginalized group took a
282
00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:55,560
particular math course and has a particular kind of recommendation from their teacher.
283
00:21:55,880 --> 00:22:03,600
Right. And so although I earlier in our conversation made a little speech about the
284
00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:08,920
thinness of information and the way we pin ourselves in with rules, I think I'm speaking to
285
00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:15,400
my natural interests there. But one of the things that I learned in this project is rules
286
00:22:15,400 --> 00:22:21,080
also at the same time are really important. And so one of the things that I think we do in this
287
00:22:21,080 --> 00:22:30,440
book is try to help people think in clear ways. We have a lot of faith in educators and in
288
00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:39,160
families and some faith in policymakers, but to try to structure for them a way of thinking
289
00:22:39,160 --> 00:22:46,960
through when are rules useful? Right. When is data productive? When are these kinds of
290
00:22:46,960 --> 00:22:53,640
assessment technologies really important? And then where do we need to really blur the edges?
291
00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:59,160
Where do we need to remove some of the rules? Where do we need to pull the guardrails a bit
292
00:22:59,160 --> 00:22:59,640
wider?
293
00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:06,520
I will say it was definitely interesting to read because I felt that tension, that push and pull
294
00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:12,720
between, you know, that pragmatic realism and then that, but that the pull of the push of the
295
00:23:12,720 --> 00:23:19,320
idealism there too. And I think as an idealist or as a dreamer, you know, myself, I found myself
296
00:23:19,320 --> 00:23:24,440
having to sit in that tension, right, and grapple with that reality of it. And, again, I
297
00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:29,680
appreciated how the book just brings it back to the first principles to the history of how these
298
00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:37,400
practices even emerged and just kind of distilled them down into their most component parts to say,
299
00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:43,600
look, we can kind of change within this range of options here to diminish distortions or to
300
00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:48,840
increase equity. And basically, we can fiddle with the sliders. But these three ideas have
301
00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:56,880
emerged to serve a particular role. And I think kind of shifting the conversation perhaps towards
302
00:23:56,920 --> 00:24:02,680
those potential solutions where you where you guys found them, either internationally, there's a
303
00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:09,560
whole section in the book where you spoke with international teachers abroad and spoiler alert
304
00:24:09,560 --> 00:24:14,800
for anyone out there, right? They didn't find magic potions out there either, in any country that
305
00:24:14,960 --> 00:24:21,760
they talked about. But what, you know, what does the successful reform of these practices be they
306
00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:26,960
grades or transcripts or the standardized testing components? What does that look like in your view?
307
00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:33,160
Like, what examples did you find abroad here at home, contemporary ones in the mastery transcript
308
00:24:33,160 --> 00:24:39,960
or historical examples that you pulled you guys draw from such a wide well of of disciplinary
309
00:24:39,960 --> 00:24:46,960
knowledge, right? And then how do we realign the goals of grading assessment reporting with the
310
00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:47,840
goals of learning?
311
00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:53,720
So I'll give my favorite one. And then Jack, I know has a different favorite one from from the
312
00:24:53,720 --> 00:24:58,520
book. So and first, I'll say, you know, any idealist out there who just needs someone to ruin
313
00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:03,680
their day, I'm happy to get on the phone and just, you know, tell you, I've often joked that I should
314
00:25:03,680 --> 00:25:08,120
just start, start a consulting firm that's just called dude, that's not going to work. And I'll
315
00:25:08,120 --> 00:25:13,200
just explain to you why it's not going to work. And you can take it early, you know, you don't please
316
00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:18,200
don't listen to me. That's no fun. That it's what's nice about writing with someone who has a little
317
00:25:18,200 --> 00:25:22,480
bit of a different temperament is like you do get that push and pull. And I am glad that it that it
318
00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:27,400
came out in the book as as being a real conversation between, you know, the two of us. And
319
00:25:27,400 --> 00:25:31,320
we've had people say, so which sections did you write? And which section? And it's like, no,
320
00:25:31,320 --> 00:25:35,640
there, it's, it's really like, it's, it's really interwoven in that way. So I'm glad it comes to.
321
00:25:36,080 --> 00:25:42,000
So I'll give a good example of something that it feels like the the history of the practice helps
322
00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:48,080
inform, you know, kind of a new way of thinking about it that recognizes the value and recognizes
323
00:25:48,080 --> 00:25:53,560
the, the, the challenge, but actually moves us forward. So, you know, historically, if we think
324
00:25:53,560 --> 00:26:02,080
about a transcript, there were very concrete, practical, physical reasons why you needed a
325
00:26:02,080 --> 00:26:08,280
transcript to be short. It needed to have, it needed to, to, to distill all the richness of an
326
00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:14,320
education to a single sheet of paper, because in the world before computers, like those transcripts
327
00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:20,920
were housed in physical spaces in filing cabinets, and you needed the school to keep that for a very
328
00:26:20,920 --> 00:26:27,040
long time. So there's a real physical space reason why it made sense for schools to try to distill
329
00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:33,800
and have a real economy of communication, economy of record keeping around student transcripts and
330
00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:42,240
student, you know, student performance. But those space constraints don't really apply anymore. I
331
00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:47,000
mean, we, you know, my transcript takes up like a few bytes of space on a computer that basically
332
00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:52,640
has with the cloud, like infinite space. So one of the ideas that we talked about is that, you know,
333
00:26:52,720 --> 00:26:58,160
if one of the challenges of the transcript is that the information is so thin, I can, I can bug
334
00:26:58,160 --> 00:27:03,280
Jack to give me a slightly higher grade, and he can record an A instead of an A minus, or let's
335
00:27:03,280 --> 00:27:09,440
be honest, an A minus instead of a B plus, then we can, you know, then I know that, you know,
336
00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:13,120
mission accomplished, no one's ever going to see that essay, and no one is ever going to be able
337
00:27:13,120 --> 00:27:19,360
to decide whether my final project was or wasn't an A minus or B plus or whatever. It's like once
338
00:27:19,360 --> 00:27:25,040
it's on the transcript, like that's the end of the game. But, and for reasons like I explained,
339
00:27:25,040 --> 00:27:31,280
like the lack of space means that there's no work behind that grade. And so one of the things we
340
00:27:31,280 --> 00:27:36,320
talk about in the book, one of the things that seems very within reach is if we made transcripts
341
00:27:36,320 --> 00:27:42,080
what we call double clickable. So if you could, for instance, not only deliver your transcript,
342
00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:49,680
but behind the grade of that transcript existed any amount of work that reflected the work
343
00:27:49,680 --> 00:27:57,360
behind that grade, we argue, and I think it's, it feels right to me that that helps focus the
344
00:27:57,360 --> 00:28:04,160
learner and the whole enterprise of education around what is the learning that is associated
345
00:28:04,160 --> 00:28:10,720
with that grade. By reattaching the work and the work product to the grade that sits on the
346
00:28:10,720 --> 00:28:16,880
transcript, you allow people to focus on not just the letter, but what's actually learned. And you
347
00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:23,200
can tell someone, a student, say, look, these are not going to be detached forever. Like someone's
348
00:28:23,200 --> 00:28:28,240
going to look, and you should actually want them to look, because then they can see all the things
349
00:28:28,240 --> 00:28:31,440
that you did and all the things that you accomplished, and maybe they even see the whole
350
00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:35,680
process of your accomplishment. So by making a transcript, by thinking about like, okay,
351
00:28:35,680 --> 00:28:41,600
the limitations no longer apply, we can recenter learning, we can recenter the actual product of
352
00:28:41,600 --> 00:28:47,120
learning, rather than just have students motivated by that, by that letter on that transcript.
353
00:28:49,120 --> 00:29:00,240
Yeah, Ethan allowed me to go with my favorite here. So I am really enamored by the idea of
354
00:29:00,560 --> 00:29:09,040
overwritable grade. So, you know, I'll start with the buzz phrase there, where we are referring to
355
00:29:09,840 --> 00:29:17,360
basically the digital capacity to replace old information with new information. And I'll back
356
00:29:17,360 --> 00:29:23,600
into an explanation of how we arrived at that as a possible way of tinkering towards reform.
357
00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:32,000
So one of the things that we talk about in the book is the fact that these assessment technologies
358
00:29:32,000 --> 00:29:40,880
arose to serve different purposes. And those purposes can be, you know, sort of shorthand
359
00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:48,960
conveyed as the purpose of communication. And they're actually two distances of communication
360
00:29:48,960 --> 00:29:54,560
that we talk about in the book, a short haul communication, an educator trying to communicate
361
00:29:54,560 --> 00:30:02,400
with a student and or their family, and a long haul communication, right. So the school, the educator,
362
00:30:02,960 --> 00:30:08,000
and sometimes even the student themselves having an interest in this communicating with distances.
363
00:30:11,040 --> 00:30:18,240
And the long haul communication, where an educator, or sometimes the students themselves
364
00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:26,560
have an interest in communicating with audiences at a distance that is either geographic or temporal,
365
00:30:26,560 --> 00:30:32,320
right, communicating with people who are really far away, or who are in the future. So that's
366
00:30:32,320 --> 00:30:37,200
communication. Then there's also motivation. That one's pretty obvious, right, the use of
367
00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:43,920
assessment technologies as a way to try to get young people to work hard and show up. And we'll
368
00:30:43,920 --> 00:30:48,640
just name the fact that, you know, we have compulsory education laws for a reason, right,
369
00:30:48,640 --> 00:30:57,040
there are lots of other things to do in this life than go to school. And then third is synchronization
370
00:30:57,040 --> 00:31:04,240
to try to stitch together the component parts of a very large cumbersome and mostly decentralized
371
00:31:04,240 --> 00:31:12,720
system. Well, let's just talk about the communication function that grades served in their origin,
372
00:31:12,720 --> 00:31:17,760
right. They were serving a short haul communication function. They really were an effort to
373
00:31:17,760 --> 00:31:25,360
communicate in shorthand with students' families. And that was related to motivation very much,
374
00:31:25,360 --> 00:31:29,920
right, because the idea was, maybe we can get these young people to work a little harder if
375
00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:36,000
their families know that they aren't applying themselves in school. And maybe we can get them
376
00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:40,400
to continue to work hard if their families praise them for all the good work that they're doing.
377
00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:45,120
So these purposes aren't always necessarily disconnected from each other, although they do
378
00:31:45,120 --> 00:31:52,800
often work across purposes. And so let's just consider how the fact that grades over time,
379
00:31:52,800 --> 00:32:00,400
so as we move from the early to mid 19th century into the 20th century and into the mid 20th century,
380
00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:07,280
we can see the grades are increasingly being used by the time we arrive at the mid 20th century
381
00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:14,320
as a way of communicating with much more distant audiences, right. By the mid 20th century,
382
00:32:14,960 --> 00:32:21,680
high school enrollment is pretty close to universal. We are moving closer to universal
383
00:32:21,680 --> 00:32:25,200
high school graduation. We still aren't there yet. We may never arrive there, right. But we
384
00:32:25,200 --> 00:32:30,480
get close enough that we get far more students attending college as a way of trying to distinguish
385
00:32:30,480 --> 00:32:37,120
themselves. And we see very real labor market benefits for students who get high school
386
00:32:37,120 --> 00:32:46,000
diplomas, who have good grades as a result of hard work in high school, and who go to college,
387
00:32:46,000 --> 00:32:51,360
right. And very real labor market returns for students who graduate from college and get good
388
00:32:51,360 --> 00:32:59,680
grades. And so we can see that students develop this very real interest in getting good grades
389
00:32:59,680 --> 00:33:05,440
in order to reap the rewards of what is essentially a credentials market there.
390
00:33:06,160 --> 00:33:14,400
So we've got two different forms of communication there. And if we think about the ways that they
391
00:33:14,400 --> 00:33:21,280
are not really designed to work together, we can begin to see problems. So the idea that grades
392
00:33:21,280 --> 00:33:25,840
were originally intended to serve a short haul communication function, and then eventually get
393
00:33:25,840 --> 00:33:31,280
used to serve this long haul communication function leads to a problem where educators will
394
00:33:31,280 --> 00:33:38,560
often want to say, hey, you don't get this, right. I'm trying to communicate to you with this grade
395
00:33:38,560 --> 00:33:42,560
that you do not fully understand this material. And I would actually like your family to know this
396
00:33:42,560 --> 00:33:49,360
because lo and behold, families care about the young people who live with them and want the best
397
00:33:49,360 --> 00:33:54,560
for them, and often can intervene. And we could have a whole separate conversation about how we
398
00:33:54,560 --> 00:34:00,720
end up in this country mostly offshoring the responsibility of giving extra assistance to
399
00:34:00,720 --> 00:34:05,840
families and the free market rather than doing it systematically, which is something that grades
400
00:34:05,840 --> 00:34:12,960
could actually serve a useful function in. But we can see that if you're trying to send this message
401
00:34:12,960 --> 00:34:17,280
to students and their families, hey, you don't get it. You're also doing something at the exact
402
00:34:17,280 --> 00:34:22,400
same time, which is ruining that student's future, right. That's how the student is going to interpret
403
00:34:22,400 --> 00:34:30,560
it is, hey, you thought that you were sending me a message by giving me a C in algebra, but do you
404
00:34:30,560 --> 00:34:37,360
know what you actually did? You actually put a black mark on my record. And this can be
405
00:34:38,000 --> 00:34:43,040
not just a problem for ambitious students who want to get into highly selective colleges and
406
00:34:43,040 --> 00:34:49,440
universities who want to have pristine transcripts, you know, and have more than a 4.0 grade point
407
00:34:49,440 --> 00:34:56,240
average. This can be devastating when we're talking about students for whom school isn't
408
00:34:56,240 --> 00:35:02,960
a natural fit, for whom, you know, there are headwinds rather than tailwinds. These black
409
00:35:02,960 --> 00:35:08,640
marks on their records pile up. And if the incentive is, hey, go to school and work hard
410
00:35:08,640 --> 00:35:15,680
because that's going to open up social and economic opportunities for you. Well, if they see, hey,
411
00:35:15,680 --> 00:35:21,200
listen, I've already got a bad enough academic record that I'm not going to benefit from this,
412
00:35:21,200 --> 00:35:28,800
right. Then that further undermines the motivation of those students. So that's a long wind up to
413
00:35:28,800 --> 00:35:36,160
a way of dealing with this problem, which is to say, well, if you made it possible to overwrite
414
00:35:36,160 --> 00:35:43,280
the student's grade, once the student gained the relevant knowledge or skill, you could actually
415
00:35:43,280 --> 00:35:48,400
have it both ways. You could actually communicate to the student and their family, hey, you don't
416
00:35:48,400 --> 00:35:55,440
get it right now, right? Right now, you've got to see in algebra or geometry or English literature
417
00:35:55,440 --> 00:36:02,160
or physical education, right? You've got to see. But that's not where this story needs to end.
418
00:36:02,160 --> 00:36:06,640
And the example that I always give, right, Ethan's going to get sick of this example,
419
00:36:06,640 --> 00:36:11,920
is that none of us knew how to ride a bike once upon a time. Nobody came out of the womb
420
00:36:11,920 --> 00:36:21,200
on a bicycle, as far as I know, right? But if we had been graded at the point in time where somebody
421
00:36:21,200 --> 00:36:26,080
had arbitrarily said, let's see if you can do it, many of us would have failed. And we would have
422
00:36:26,080 --> 00:36:30,720
had to carry around on our transcripts an F in bike riding, despite the fact that the vast majority
423
00:36:30,720 --> 00:36:37,440
of us later learned that skill, right? Why carry around outdated information? Maybe you did fail
424
00:36:37,440 --> 00:36:44,320
algebra. And maybe you then learned that skill. Why carry the F forever on a transcript,
425
00:36:44,320 --> 00:36:48,800
instead of being able to overwrite that information with more accurate information
426
00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:54,960
that actually is going to better serve the purpose of communicating to future audiences
427
00:36:54,960 --> 00:37:00,480
what you know and can do? I think that's another thing that I appreciated about the book was,
428
00:37:01,280 --> 00:37:10,080
uh, in the sense that you explore historical examples of narrative reports and of portfolio
429
00:37:10,080 --> 00:37:15,440
systems and all of these other kind of one size fits all replacements, right, that were meant to
430
00:37:15,440 --> 00:37:22,720
replace, upend, a revolution in grading, testing, reporting, and all these things. And really, I
431
00:37:22,720 --> 00:37:28,000
think a message that I took away from the book was certainly that, you know, these hybrid models
432
00:37:28,000 --> 00:37:33,680
where we're kind of Frankensteining together the best purposes of every kind of system are going
433
00:37:33,680 --> 00:37:39,280
to be the things that are ultimately going to make any successful grading, reporting, testing,
434
00:37:39,280 --> 00:37:45,600
reform work in the long run is not trying to replace one, the flaws of one one size fits all
435
00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:50,080
with the flaws of another one size fits all, but really trying to take the good where we can find
436
00:37:50,080 --> 00:37:56,160
it and wherever that might come from. And again, that that's not a huge appeal to my dreamer
437
00:37:56,160 --> 00:38:00,720
idealism, but gosh, that makes a lot of pragmatic sense as somebody who has to work within the
438
00:38:00,720 --> 00:38:06,640
system, who has kids in the system too, who has to attend to systemic coherence. So again,
439
00:38:06,640 --> 00:38:13,520
I appreciated that long view both historically and then, you know, in terms of depth of our system
440
00:38:13,520 --> 00:38:20,400
and the need to communicate from K-12 and beyond to employers to to the whole nine yards. I think
441
00:38:20,400 --> 00:38:26,080
then one thing kind of wrapping up the conversation here is just to get from both of you
442
00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:33,120
kind of a sense of what do you think is really missing in the public conversation around
443
00:38:33,680 --> 00:38:40,480
grades, transcripts, testing the focus of the book and what would be your goal about how we can speak
444
00:38:40,480 --> 00:38:46,480
about these things differently or how we can enrich the public conversation, short of buying
445
00:38:46,480 --> 00:38:53,040
your book, of course, but then how can we speak to people differently about these distortions and
446
00:38:53,040 --> 00:39:00,240
the problems and the benefits and the equity and the need to communicate? I'm going to beat Ethan
447
00:39:00,240 --> 00:39:06,320
to the buzzer here just so I can respond to the thing that I think we both want to respond to
448
00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:13,440
before the question, which was your comment there. And both of us owe a debt of gratitude to
449
00:39:14,240 --> 00:39:21,440
David Tyak and Larry Cuban because totally embedded in the way that you were just describing
450
00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:29,600
our project are some ideas that entirely come from them. And this idea of Frankensteining or
451
00:39:29,600 --> 00:39:38,000
hybridizing, that's a Tyak and Cuban idea. And the idea that, you know, we can't just wash away the
452
00:39:38,000 --> 00:39:47,360
past, that every layer of educational policy, every layer of the culture of schooling builds
453
00:39:47,360 --> 00:39:53,680
upon the previous layers, right? That's a Tyak and Cuban idea. And even our dedication of the book,
454
00:39:53,680 --> 00:40:00,880
right? The book is dedicated to our students is a ripoff of David and Larry, which is not to say
455
00:40:00,880 --> 00:40:08,880
that the rest of the book is, but we would encourage people to read side by side our book
456
00:40:08,880 --> 00:40:15,760
with Tinkering Toward Utopia by David and Larry. So now I'll actually answer the question and try
457
00:40:15,760 --> 00:40:22,240
not to be so long winded and then kick it over to Ethan. But I think my great hope for this book is
458
00:40:22,240 --> 00:40:28,240
not that people will read it and say, great, look, we're going to go with double clickable
459
00:40:28,240 --> 00:40:33,280
transcripts. We're going to go with overwritable grades. We're going to restore the use value of
460
00:40:33,280 --> 00:40:40,960
education. That's not our hope. At least it's not my hope. My hope is that we will just make visible
461
00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:47,440
the water in which we swim. That's my hope because I know that I speak for both of us that we have
462
00:40:47,440 --> 00:40:53,200
tremendous confidence in the three and a half million educators who are at work every day in
463
00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:59,280
this country. We have tremendous confidence in the ability of the 50 million students who are in
464
00:40:59,280 --> 00:41:04,640
our public schools to speak up for themselves, including in the kind of work that you guys do.
465
00:41:06,080 --> 00:41:14,080
We have a lot of faith in families who really want the best for young people, but we inhabit
466
00:41:14,720 --> 00:41:22,320
an educational policy space and an educational culture that makes invisible practices that
467
00:41:23,040 --> 00:41:30,160
are totally ordinary to us. Not ordinary because they don't have any negative unintended
468
00:41:30,160 --> 00:41:36,400
consequences or don't matter, but ordinary because we completely expect them. We talked earlier about
469
00:41:36,400 --> 00:41:41,600
quote unquote real school and the grammar of schooling. It would be odd to us if we didn't
470
00:41:41,600 --> 00:41:47,520
see grades, tests, and transcripts. And in fact, we totally expect the unintended consequences as
471
00:41:47,520 --> 00:41:54,240
well. We say things like, well, tests are just a part of life. Or we will say out of one side of
472
00:41:54,240 --> 00:41:59,360
our mouths, hey, you should be really focused on learning this material. This material really
473
00:41:59,360 --> 00:42:03,040
matters. And then out of the other sides of our mouths, we'll say things like, hey, you have to
474
00:42:03,040 --> 00:42:10,400
get a better grade in this course. You don't want to have this on your transcript. And so what my
475
00:42:10,400 --> 00:42:17,440
big hope is, is that people will read this book and think about grades, tests, and transcripts
476
00:42:17,440 --> 00:42:26,400
not as ordinary features of real schools, but as technologies that we continue to choose to use
477
00:42:27,040 --> 00:42:36,400
often inappropriately every single day in school. 180 days a year for all 13 years of the K through
478
00:42:36,400 --> 00:42:44,480
12 experience and then into higher ed for students who go to four, or in our case, 10 more years
479
00:42:44,480 --> 00:42:51,840
after that. So if we can see what is presently invisible to us, then we can talk about it. And
480
00:42:51,840 --> 00:43:02,160
if we can talk about it, then we can act. I'm not an ideas person. I'm a grumpy person. I'm
481
00:43:02,320 --> 00:43:08,080
not going to work. But I do think that it strikes me when I listen to people
482
00:43:10,960 --> 00:43:17,040
struggle against our grading system. And we saw this in the pandemic where lots of things were
483
00:43:17,040 --> 00:43:22,960
disrupted and people were having really difficult conversations in the public about what was fair
484
00:43:22,960 --> 00:43:28,000
and what was possible and what would happen and the long-term consequences. And could we set this
485
00:43:28,000 --> 00:43:33,520
aside and should we just give everyone an A and what would happen? It struck me as that what we
486
00:43:33,520 --> 00:43:40,320
lacked was a real common language for having these conversations. And so, especially I think
487
00:43:40,320 --> 00:43:46,400
the project started before the pandemic, but what the pandemic I think really added to the book was
488
00:43:47,200 --> 00:43:52,880
really, it foregrounded for me and Jack that we needed to give people, one of the best things we
489
00:43:52,880 --> 00:43:58,560
could do is give people a language to talk about all of these different functions that grades serve
490
00:43:58,560 --> 00:44:03,920
and then they're underlying, like where they come from in the system. And once we provided that,
491
00:44:03,920 --> 00:44:10,480
and if you look at the last chapter, we really imagined the last chapter being like, we thought
492
00:44:10,480 --> 00:44:19,040
like, well, maybe my sister and her colleagues would sit down with the book and say, okay,
493
00:44:19,040 --> 00:44:23,040
let's think about our practices. And now that we have this language, maybe we can talk about,
494
00:44:23,040 --> 00:44:28,080
okay, what about this? And what about this? Because we really do believe in the strength
495
00:44:28,080 --> 00:44:34,880
of a plural approach to learning and that there isn't a one size fits all. And so providing a
496
00:44:34,880 --> 00:44:39,520
language that people could be on the same page and talking about it, but arrive at different
497
00:44:39,520 --> 00:44:44,880
conclusions about what makes sense for them and their students or their communities, that to me
498
00:44:44,880 --> 00:44:51,600
was the big step that we can take forward because I will not, I mean, we have solutions, we pitch
499
00:44:51,600 --> 00:44:56,240
some to your listeners, but it would be totally fine with me if everyone decided that those were
500
00:44:56,240 --> 00:45:03,040
bad ideas. If they said, okay, actually, what we need is not the double clickable. What we need is
501
00:45:03,760 --> 00:45:09,120
this and this, and we can serve those functions. So providing some clarity and hopefully the
502
00:45:09,200 --> 00:45:14,640
history kind of comes through and people can see why we got to where we were. It wasn't just
503
00:45:14,640 --> 00:45:21,200
bad actors. It wasn't just random. It wasn't just some like factory model that someone, you know,
504
00:45:21,200 --> 00:45:26,320
these are learned things that have accreted over time. So that's the big thing that I hope people
505
00:45:26,320 --> 00:45:29,840
will take from the book, whether they like our solutions or not. And that's the whole thing I
506
00:45:29,840 --> 00:45:34,320
hope that we'll endure and sort of animate or help illuminate conversations in the future.
507
00:45:35,280 --> 00:45:40,480
Right. None of these systems fell from the sky in a single piece to be implemented as is, right?
508
00:45:40,480 --> 00:45:46,720
They're the result of, you know, that both the social construction, the historical construction,
509
00:45:46,720 --> 00:45:52,960
but I think to emphasize that construction part recognizes how it's situated in the past
510
00:45:52,960 --> 00:45:58,240
and in a collective reality, but also kind of recognizes the potential and possibility that,
511
00:45:58,240 --> 00:46:03,440
hey, we can do something different to help meet our needs and the needs of our kids here in the
512
00:46:03,760 --> 00:46:11,440
present or perhaps in the future too. So again, I just, I really appreciate that balance of that
513
00:46:11,440 --> 00:46:17,920
realism, that idealism, that pragmatism. I think for me it was a huge appeal of the book. So the
514
00:46:17,920 --> 00:46:23,120
book, of course, is Off the Mark, How Grades, Ratings, and Rankings Undermine Learning, but
515
00:46:23,120 --> 00:46:28,320
don't have to, from Jack and Ethan. Thank you guys both so much for joining me today.
516
00:46:29,120 --> 00:46:30,000
Thank you for having us.
517
00:46:30,000 --> 00:46:31,280
Yeah. Thanks for having us. This was fun.
518
00:46:34,160 --> 00:46:38,000
Thank you again for listening to our podcast at Human Restoration Project. I hope this
519
00:46:38,000 --> 00:46:42,240
conversation leaves you inspired and ready to start making change. If you enjoyed listening,
520
00:46:42,240 --> 00:46:45,840
please consider leaving us a review on your favorite podcast player. Plus,
521
00:46:45,840 --> 00:46:50,240
find a whole host of free resources, writings, and other podcasts all for free on our website,
522
00:46:50,240 --> 00:46:53,600
HumanRestorationProject.org. Thank you.